Reposted from Puppetworld
Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange accepts a CD from Rudolph Elmer which reveals tax evation by wealthy clients of Swiss Bank Julius Baer, a rival of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland.
Puppetworld Post Exclusive, last updated Jan 18 2011
After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland. The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank AG opened in Switzerland in 1968.
On January 17, 2011, Assange held a press conference at The Frontline Club where Rudolf Elmer, a former employee of Bank Julius Baer, gave Assange private files from the bank’s Cayman Islands’ operation. Elmer said he wanted to expose mass tax evasion before he flies back to Switzerland to stand trial for stealing information from a bank. Although Elmer has not named the tax evaders, he claims the CD files contain information about 40 politicians, many business people, multinational conglomerates and “people who have made their living in the arts.”
Rothschilds’ Swiss Bank Battles: Assange’s press conference was actually a public threat to Bank Julius Baer: Wikileaks first disclosed some of Elmer’s Julius-Baer material in 2008, naming ten clients. At the time, Julius Baer sued and got a court injunction to effectively shut down Wikileaks.org at its web host in California. Subsequently, the law firm Fox Rothschild represented Wikileaks, got the injunction overturned, and got Wikileaks.org back on line. Immediately, WL commenced leaking more of Elmer’s documents, which was damaging to Bank Julius Baer.
Bank JB got a lot of negative publicity from its attempt to censor the Internet. When JB lost the suit, their super-elite clients became fearful of being exposed and prosecuted for tax evasion and money laundering. Julius Baer shares dropped 60% during the next ten months. On Dec. 4, 2008, the 52-year-old CEO of Julius Baer, Alex Widmer, was unexpectedly found dead.
“He was the most important person in private banking,” said a Zurich-based trader.
“This is a setback for the bank (Julius Baer),” a Swiss trading analyst said.
Reports of the cause of death were contradictory and vague and an autopsy was never released.
Wikileaks’ Julian Assange filming a video for The Economist (a Rothschild publication) which gave him its New Media Award
Wikileaks’ many other links to Rothschilds
The recent imprisonment of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange strains credulity. His arrest by Interpol, his incarceration under draconian conditions for breaking a condom are in themselves highly unlikely events, but the timing of his imprisonment with the release of classified US cables and the campaign against Wikileaks’ funding and website host bear the trademarks of a covert operation.
The Puppetworld Post has uncovered many links between Wikileaks and the international Rothschild network:
–a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange (Puppetworld Post exclusive)
–The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008
–Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site
– The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds (PwP exclusive)
–the owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds
–Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer
–US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)
[The Rothschilds are an international family of bankers at the centre of a web of wealthy families who control most the countries through a worldwide network of: privately-owned central banks (masquerading as federal banks), major news chains, trusts, councils, etcetera. An unnamed source has put their monetary worth near $100 trillion—dwarfing the net worth of the likes of Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, etc.]
Zac Goldsmith (married to Kate Rothschild) winning the election with sister, Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith)(right), and mother, Annabel Goldsmith
Socialite, heiress Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) posted 20 000 pounds ($32 000) for the bail of Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange. She’s genetically related to the Rothschilds and she is a sister-in-law (Daily Mail Online, 10 May 2010). Her father, the late James Goldsmith—British banker, publisher–is a cousin to the Rothschilds. James’ grandfather Adolphe Goldschmidt came to London as a multi-millionaire in 1895 and changed the family name from the German Goldschmidt to the English Goldsmith. The Goldschmidts, like their neighbors and relatives the Rothschilds, had been prosperous merchant bankers in Frankfurt Germany since the 16th century (Wikipedia).
Following the Rothschild’s centuries-old edict to interbreed, Jemima Khan’s brother, Ben, wed Kate Rothschild in 2003 and recently her other brother, Zac, a new MP in British parliament had been having an affair with his brother’s sister-in-law, Alice Rothschild (Kate’s sister), up until he divorced his wife four days after he was elected MP. Zac and Alice are presently living together. Khan’s brothers are marrying into Rothschild wealth.
The Rothschilds began grooming Julian Assange in 2008, when Wikileaks was awarded The Economist’s New Media Award. The Economist is the voice of Britain’s establishment (led by the British Rothschilds) which has, for example, on balance, supported Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war. Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on The Economist’s board. The Rothschild family also has a large shareholder interest in The Economist.
At first blush, it is incredulous that the The Economist, the pinnacle of the establishment, would give their award to Assange knowing full well that he was releasing classified government documents and being overly aware of the havoc this will create in the world. The Rothschilds’ oft- stated goal (over the centuries) is for a One World Government (i.e. The New World Order). To this end they engineer conflict between nations, to create crises that will then be utilized to increase the power of international entities – the UN, World Bank, IMF, etc. For example, they (and other closely-related families like the Schiffs) financed the Bolsheviks. In the past, the Rothschild empire have profited by bankrolling both sides of war.
US senator Joe Lieberman is the Rothschild’s point man in America. During the last presidential election, he took his friend, Republican candidate John McCain to Jacob Rothschild’s house for a fund-raiser for McCain. Lieberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (a Rothschild cabal which is essentially the shadow government of the US). Lieberman’s recent actions resulted in cutting off the money supply of Wikileaks: Paypal, Mastercard, Visa, stopped accepting donations for Wikileaks. Lieberman publicly took credit for censoring Wikileaks’ website by pressuring Amazon to stop hosting the website. The result was that Anonymous hactivists launched attacks on the websites of companies (above) which had discontinued service to Wikileaks. Lieberman’s campaign against Wikileaks had the effect of increasing the martyrdom and hence the popularity of Assange and Wikileaks. Lieberman made Assange a star, nearly becoming Time magazine’s Man of The Year.
Julian Assange’s lawyer is Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, a major London elite law firm. They are the legal adviser to the Rothschild’s prestigious Waddesdon Trust.
Assange’s main media partner is The Guardian. The Guardian has been infiltrated by Rothschilds. The Guardian is controlled by Guardian Media Group whose chairman is Paul Myners a past employee of N. M. Rothschild Limited & Sons Limited. Guardian Media Group is owned by Scott Trust which became a limited private company in 2008 with all trustees becoming directors of the Scott Trust. Anthony Salz was appointed as a trustee of Scott Trust in 2009: He is currently executive vice-chairman of the investment Bank Rothschild.
The Guardian gave the US cables to the current New York Times. The chairman of the NYT is Arthur Sulzberger Jr., a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the son of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger and grandson of Arthur Hays Sulzberger who served as a Trustee for the Rockefeller Foundation (in cahoots with Rothschilds for One World Government).
After a time in a real prison, Assange was “imprisoned” in a countryside mansion at the home of Vaughan Smith, the owner of Frontline Trust, a news organization that seeks to influence TV journalists. Frontline is funded by George Soros’ organization, Open Society Institute, and George Soros is intimately intertwined with the Rothschilds. George Soros has been a frequent business partner with James Goldsmith (father of Jemima Khan and cousin of the Rothschilds). The director of Soros’ Open Society Institute, Richard Katz was director of N M Rothschild & Sons for 16 years. Other board members like Nils Taube also hold positions in Rothschild banks, etcetera. On October 25 and July 27 this year, Assange was a speaker at Vaughan Smith’s Frontline Trust.
Most people seem to believe that current events just happen, that events in the news are chain reactions of accidents, and that people with money and power sit idly by, watching events unfold. However, The Rothschilds thrive on manipulating the markets by having insider information while propagating contrary misinformation. In this way, they make huge profits. Assange has already said that damaging information on one US bank will be released. In this fragile recovery, the crisis could be pivotal. The Guardian and the New York Times have this information so it is available to Rothschilds in order to “short” the bank before the information is released. Wikileaks is an invaluable tool for the Rothschilds to manipulate the financial markets, the whole monetary system, the future of nations, and the public.
The information (or misinformation) from Wikileaks also serves the Rothschild’s aim to increase conflict among nations in order to further their goal of One World Government.
91 Responses to “Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links”
Claus Dettelbacher says:February 15, 2011 at 7:54 am
Very well written articles that stand out from the usual copy-pasting – also comitted by alternative media. As you mention, who nowadays has the time (an funding) to do both, in depth research and connecting the dots in a meaningful way.
Maybe have a look at the Daily Bell, a Swiss/Lichtenstein based online magazine with a very similar take. I just emailed them a link to this article.Reply
Charleston Voice says:July 18, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Tony Wile of the Daily Bell has a lot to conceal, but being a Rothschild cover is not one of them.
Charleston Voice says:July 18, 2011 at 12:29 pmReply
che20/20 says:July 19, 2011 at 4:47 pm
Please clarify: Why is the Daily Bell or Tony Wile significant to this article about Wikileaks?Reply
Joachim Kim Cools says:February 16, 2011 at 4:45 am
Will post it with a link in facebook.
John Turner says:February 16, 2011 at 6:12 am
I appreciate this article. However, some [or ANY] links or citations to source material would be very helpful for credibility and for passing truth along to others. Research is worthless if not shared in its entirety. To say: “You go and chase the reference sources yourself” does nothing but keep possibly valid and important information from being widely disseminated, and from being understood and accepted by enough people to make a difference in defeating the rising global plutocracy. How about it?Reply
che20/20 says:February 16, 2011 at 11:09 pm
Very good advice. I do meticulous research: I should show that too–to get more credibility. Thanks.Reply
John Turner says:February 20, 2011 at 5:58 pm
You’re welcome. Now when will you come through with source citations for this article? That’s the only missing piece from otherwise stellar material..
che20/20 says:February 22, 2011 at 12:52 pm
When I originally did the article, I found reliable sources for everything. I’ve sourced part of the Wikileaks article with links–Julius Baer and a bit of Jemima Khan. I’m not sure what else might need sources: You could help me by letting me know what else I can put the links into.Reply
Anonymous says:March 31, 2011 at 11:54 pm
Please cite as many parts of the article as you can. The main argument against conspiracy theories is that they are not cited very well.
Alfred Burdett says:April 1, 2011 at 1:27 pm
“An unnamed source has put their [the Rothschild’s] monetary worth near $100 trillion”
Is this something someone told you in confidence, or is there a document or other source in which this unnamed source is cited and from which we might obtain some idea of the veracity of the claim?
I raise this question because it is perhaps the key issue. Any entity controlling assets equal to more than half of the total assets of the US economy can be assumed without much question to have control over any government — if it so chooses.
che20/20 says:April 1, 2011 at 2:43 pm
For me, the key issue is that the odds of any individual having this many links to the Rothschilds simply by chance is impossibly large. My unnamed source was a retired management consultant and I think his estimate is credible. We can’t know for sure since the Roths are privately owned companies who don’t report profits. We can only look at what evidence the few sources have reported:
Year Rothschilds’ Net Worth Source
1815 3,332,000 francs The Economic History of the Jews, Baron, Salo W. et al, Schocken Books (a Jewish-oriented publisher), 1975
1818 500, 000 pounds Ferguson, Niall (commissioned Rothschild biographer with full access to records)
1828 118,400,000 francs ditto
4, 330,333 pounds ditto
1850 $6, 000,000,000 Morton (see below)
1913 $2, 000, 000, 000 The Romance of The Rocthschilds, Balla, Ignatius, 1913
Morton (1962) noted that the Rothschild wealth was estimated at over $6 billion US in 1850. Not a significant amount in today’s dollars; however, consider the potential future value compounded over 147 years!
Taking $6 billion (and assuming no erosion of the wealth base) and compounding
$1.9 trillion US (@ 4%)
$7.8 trillion US (@ 5%)
$31.5 trillion US (@ 6%)
$125,189.1 trillion US (@ 7%)
$491,409.0 trillion US (@ 8%)
$2 trillion is far too low as Balla says it was already $2 trillion by 1913. I would assume that with all their influence and insider knowledge that the Rothschild banking family would be able to average 7% profit over time. So the estimate seems reasonable given what has been reported
Alfred Burdett says:April 2, 2011 at 1:40 pm
che20/20: Thanks for the info. about estimates of the Rothschilds’ wealth.
Working from an 1850 base looks dodgy to me. If you work from the 1913 estimate and assume 7% annual growth, then you get only one quarter of a trillion, a decent amount, several times the net worth of the Walton (Walmart) family, but not a staggering amount.
A related question is how coordinated are the Rothschilds today? Nathan, the founder of the family’s fortune organized the activity of his brothers tightly, but there are many, many descendants now who share whatever fortune remains. It is hard to believe they all follow a single line either in their investments or their political actions.Reply
che20/20 says:April 2, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Sorry, I made an error: I have a bad cold and I thought the 1913 figure by Bala was $2 trillion instead of $2 billion. My apologies. I guess more research is needed–perhaps a graph to identify which figures don’t fit the pattern of growth of the Rothschild forture (i.e. are in error).Reply
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law says:February 16, 2011 at 6:38 pm
[…] full article Mirror […]Reply
Mr. Fiat Currency Printing II says:February 17, 2011 at 5:15 pm
This is brilliant. When Wiki-Roth started ‘exposing’ Bank of America and JP Morgan instinctively I knew this was based on banking. There is much more going on than even this and I suspect they are pushing people/countries into some type of new banking system, i.e., chaos, civil turbulence, US State Department now running Farsi language on twitter, NGO ‘soft war’ (Crisis International brought down Egypt) on these countries like Egypt and Tunisia.
Wiki-Roth will never permit Islamic banking and this is what we see happening.Reply
Geo says:February 20, 2011 at 6:46 pm
“Anti-semitic comments will not be tolerated” however it is troubling that everyone named considers themselves Jewish (yet most do not believe in a god). Without some sense nationhood there is no guilt over destroying lives; everyone is available for looting.Reply
che20/20 says:February 20, 2011 at 7:43 pm
I’m not sure I understand. I don’t think it matters who is Jewish. The main vanguard of Rothschild authority in America is David Rockefeller–and he is probably not Jewish–probably Christian–so therefore Christianity must bear the blame for plutocracy in the USA? It has nothing to do with religion: it’s all about the MONEY Power. Personally, I don’t care what their religion is: I don’t care what the psychological motives are for their obsession to control every person on the planet– it has no bearing. In fact, you are playing right into their hands if you turn it into a religious argument: you will be labeled antisemitic and dismissed. That is like committing political suicide. It would be as silly as running a campaign against Obama objecting to his race. If they were trying to force their religion on us, then religion would be an issue. It’s about the tax we pay them through income tax, loans, mortgages, and inflation. Ultimately it is an issue of power and subservience. Not religion.Reply
sarz says:February 21, 2011 at 12:27 pm
Please take a look at this article, the first paragraph of which says, “A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The book is entitled “The Grandees – America’s Sephardic Elite.” The author is Stephen Birmingham, who is recognized by the Jewish community as an expert on Jewish history.”
che20/20 says:February 21, 2011 at 1:04 pm
I don’t really care if they are Jewish, Buddhist or Muslim or if you can link there behavior to something in the Koran or the Talmud. It has no bearing any more than their skin color, eye color or ethnic background. They do not use religion to exploit people, so their religion is not the issue. They use the MONEY Power to exploit people. There are plenty of websites that want to reduce everything to religion. That is really a red herring: we must stay focussed on the real issue.Reply
olga juric says:July 6, 2012 at 6:42 am
pierre says:February 23, 2011 at 1:21 am
It is comitting political suicide to say that 911 was an inside job, and that the CIA AND Mossad were likely involved. You will be lablelled unamerican AND antisemitic anyway.Reply
Maven51 says:April 5, 2011 at 10:02 pm
Beautifully stated che/20, “Ultimately it is an issue of power and subservience. Not religion.”
These people have only one god and it is currency; one religion and it is subservience.
Every country should have its own National Banking System like Japan which it barrows from and is indebted to.
Do not let your personal biases (anger, worry, fears) confuse you; keep your eye puppet master.
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
“The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it’s profits or so dependant on it’s favors, that there will be no opposition from that class.” — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
“When you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds in out account to cover the check, but when the Federal Reserve writes a check there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money.” — Putting it simply, Boston Federal Reserve Bank
“I don’t really care if they are Jewish, Buddhist or Muslim or if you can link there behavior to something in the Koran or the Talmud. …
That is really a red herring: we must stay focussed on the real issue.” — che/20 – February 21, 2011 at 1:04 pmReply
Tatiana Walman says:February 21, 2011 at 9:53 am
Nice post. The info presented here was the best I could find all day lengthy, and I have been searching hard on the Internet. I think you ought to put this up on a large social bookmarking site, you will find that it spreads like wildfire – Cheers – daveReply
Anna says:March 1, 2011 at 9:04 pm
which website/social network would you suggest pls?Reply
Gnos888 says:February 21, 2011 at 10:35 am
When are we going to see the western world stand up to its overlords as the courageous young Arabs to a man and woman are doing daily all of this year ? If Egypt can ouster the $64 Billion Dollar Hosni, how much freedom could the ouster of the Red Schield Bank Barons and all their ilk not to mention the seizure of up to $500 TRILLION in ill-gotten gains. Take from the banking cartel as if they were a drug cartel, give it all over for the creation of global health care, universal ethical education, complete poverty eradication and world standard infrastructure. The New World Order should be created by and for the people of planet earth using the capital of the decapitated banking elite octopus ! Its not like they are doing enough with it or doing it well enough, to justify that 1% controlling 99% of global wealth. The only way for the western world to remain culturally alive is to seize the capacity to live how we decide.Reply
che20/20 says:February 21, 2011 at 1:12 pm
I like your point that they have most the wealth and they are not doing much good with it–their track record is very very poor–they at least engineered WWI, the Great Depression– and the world is in a poor state today with massive hunger, starvation, sickness and poverty. I declare the plutocracy a colossal failure!Reply
pierre says:February 21, 2011 at 10:56 pm
if 90% of the plutocrats were colored blue, it would not be out of line to say that blue people rule most of the world and seek to rule, or destroy, the rest. If the Protocols of Zion are true and indicative of the mentaility of a certain cult or creed , religious or business class or otherwise, then that sort of racial supremecism is not something the world needs or can live with. call a spade a spade. the trick is to second guess these manipulative and scheming second guessers. they overestimate their powers and completely underestimate the power of those they call the cattle, and moreso the more estanged they become from the masses. baby, what a big surprise they have in stall for them.Reply
che20/20 says:February 21, 2011 at 11:36 pm
So you want to pick one thing about the majority of the plutocrats and make it into a battle over religion. A feminist might object that the majority (of plutocrats) are men and turn it into a war against sexism. A person of color may object to the fact that they are white and turn it into movement against racial discrimination. Youth may focus on the fact that old men rule the world and want to fight against ageism. But these are just characteristics of the majority of plutocrats. These characteristics are not the means by which they exercise their power over us. The means is by controlling a worldwide system based on money. The Rothschilds are not a theocracy, they are a plutocracy. The Bush family are card carrying members of the New World Order and they have wooed the Bin Laden family (the construction empire) over the past thirty years. It’s about money.
IMHO spirituality is different from religion and they are both different from The Church(es)–megacorporations with religious franchises in every town–and just like opposing political teams, they too serve as part of the puppet show–opposing religious teams provide the conflict for wonderful theatre in the mass media. IMHO to focus on their religion or skin colour or sex is participating in a distraction and bad strategy.
P.S. If you want to respond to this post, it has to be about how the agenda of the New World Order is as much about religion as money–imposing a theocracy as well as a plutocracy.Reply
Tina says:February 21, 2011 at 11:35 pm
I suspected from the beginning that Wikileaks was tool to spread disinformation to confuse the masses. It leaks information that is either already out there or not very explosive. Then to see how Assange is a media darling makes it even more obvious that he’s just a puppet.Reply
che20/20 says:February 21, 2011 at 11:49 pm
Yeah Wikileaks does have that gossip-sheet feel to it. You have to wonder if that’s calculated for mass appeal: an international scandal sheet.Reply
Jim Wilson says:February 22, 2011 at 8:41 am
The people of the world are protesting against the corrupt governments, yet politicians are merely front men and women for the Rothchilds. Maybe we people of the world need to also target the Rothchild’s businesses. It’s money they value, so let’s target and make an impact on what they value by encouraging a cessation of trade with their business. It’s the Rothchilds et al. we need to be removing, in addition to the puppet politicians. The change has to start with the leaders,(Rothchild and other families) not the middle management (politicans).Reply
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Wound Rival Bank « The Invisible Opportunity: Hidden Truths Revealed says:February 22, 2011 at 10:41 am
[…] via Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Wound Rival Bank | Puppetworld Post. […]Reply
Henrik says:February 22, 2011 at 11:24 am
Who funded the Rothschild family from the beggining? I think there lies our real masters.Reply
Supa Nov says:February 22, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Of course this whole thing is planned, c’mon the guy is “hollywood” good looking. With such “sensitive information,” he would have been nuetralized a long time ago.Reply
adonis king says:February 22, 2011 at 9:27 pm
Well done.. I had sort of suspected something like this but did not have the time nor inclination to go this far into depth. I have reposted it via Facebook with a caviot that i have yet to confirm all of the information but I would say it is very likely to check out just fine. PEACE ~a~Reply
Ron says:February 22, 2011 at 9:47 pm
Money is just a “power-family” created device together with fear and greed to harness the energies of the rest of humanity through which to “legitimately” take possession of the planet and everything on/in it. After that the farmed humanity can be used to seed the rest of the solarsystem/galaxy/etc with an array of differing populations thereby setting up an infinite potential for a continuation of the same “resource, trade and war” bullshit that got the “world’s leaders” whare they are today and for these “world-lords” to become “universal-gods”, perhaps.Reply
Kamille says:February 23, 2011 at 12:33 am
We’re running out of time – and considering the advanced weapons technology (lethal and non-lethal) the cabal has, even if people woke up and stood up against them I’m not sure we’d have much of a defense against them.
That’s why I think we need to start doing some damage control in the Mass Consciousness… perhaps by visualizing the NWO folks as a decrepit old vampire that is caught in sunlight and turning into dust. Once we reach critical mass by way of Mass Consciousness, the bankers and their ilk won’t be able to maintain their influence over humanity. United thought… they can’t fight that – there are more of us than there are of them!Reply
che20/20 says:February 23, 2011 at 9:19 am
Great idea (seriously) –maybe vampires sucking out your soul really. You can be in charge of Psyops for the peaceful revolution!Reply
Peter Daniel says:March 1, 2011 at 11:49 pm
I agree with you. One day soon I believe we will reach critical mass and devour the NWO. From what I am seeing around the Globe the NWO are on a path to self destruction anyway. It is just up to us to help them on their way as quickly as possible.
After watching John Pilger’s documentary ‘The War You Don’t See’ I am fine with Julian Assange. What ever side people believe he is on he is responsible for exposing critical information we may never otherwise have had access to.
I did not enjoy seeing the I think 10 Reuters Journalists shot in cold blood by airforce personnel on a US helicopter gunship then the family of Iraq’s that attempted to save them as well and the follow up, all exposed by Julian Assange.Reply
D’Wizz says:March 2, 2011 at 5:24 am
NO! – Pfc. Bradley Manning leaked the documents to WL. Assange just orchestrated the accolades from it’s “release” to be directed at him. He’s the son of thespians. He craves applause by nature but works for an organ-grinder. Real organs.Reply
exohuman | Is Wikileaks a Rothschild Operation? says:February 24, 2011 at 2:11 pm
[…] Puppetworld Post Exclusive, last updated Jan 18 2011 Share this post: Blog this! Recommend on Facebook Share via […]Reply
call a spade a spade says:February 28, 2011 at 6:09 am
It is time to change banks to Co-Operative Bank. Do you have a co-op bank in your city or town? Would you transfer your banking to your local co-op bank? UK has Co-op bank. Kenya has co-op bank.Reply
Eyes That See, Ears That Hear says:February 28, 2011 at 12:12 pm
A link from The Daily Bell sent me scurrying to your website, and my journey was certainly not in vain. What I read thus far is the clearest and must succinct discussion of the Rothschild Conspiracy (if such it can be called) that I’ve found any where. I have long held that pointing to this clan’s “Jewishness” was a red herring. Instead, it was a matter of plutocracy rather than whether or not these dynastic bankers were Shepardic or Khazarian Jews.
Lining up the dots in terms of the Plutocracy’s involvement in the recent Mid-Eastern/North African “Revolutions” was an intellectual exercise that I had not yet done. It makes perfect sense now that it has been laid out for all to see. Thank you for your contribution to a better understanding of the banking/geopolitics involved in these so-called spontaneous “revolutions of the people”.Reply
che20/20 says:March 4, 2011 at 1:34 pm
Thanks. The Rothschilds funded Lenin and Trotsky and the Bolsheviks and maybe Marx too, all seemingly rabid anti-religious ex-Jews who made religion (including Judaism) illegal in the USSR. True, they set up the state of Israel, but that may have been more to establish a power centre in the oil-rich Middle East near the strategic Suez Canal. They don’t spend their money and efforts on spreading Judaism, but rather on controlling the finances of the world, bleeding the wealth of citizens through the secret control of governments, central banking and their network of banks. For me, their religion, whatever it may be, is not the issue and thus is another distraction they can utilize.Reply
chaukeedaar says:March 2, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Very interesting, I liked the impartial style of the author, especially in his comment answers.
If Wikileaks really was a Rothschild operation it was not successful in my case: My research and resistance against NWO started when they called for murder of Julian Assange… So naturally until I read this article I was a strong supporter of Wikileaks and at the very first moment I could not believe that all the damage that was done by Wikileaks to the elites was just staged or taken as collateral damage. But lets think: Who was damaged? Mostly the United States as a “Government” is attacked (Collateral Murder video, embassy cabels…). It could well be in the interest of the Rothschilds to speed up the collapse of the Dollar and the US government in general as it seems that they have charged it off for some time… From production to finance and even housing everything has been transported to China and Singapur in the last years, ever heard of the chinese brand new Ghost Cities, and Henry Kissinger going in and out in China? They have abandoned Amerika and use Wikileaks to speed up its collapse… I’m not sure, does that sound logic?Reply
che20/20 says:March 4, 2011 at 1:57 pm
I wanted to believe in Assange too, but when I did my research I found far too many hard, definite links to the Rothschilds. I have researched other individuals and organizations and found very little: they have come up clean.
The US is the major instrument of the Rothschild’s NWO–they control it through many organizations including the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Research Council, the Trilateral Commission, etc., etc.. Nonetheless, the Roths already completely control the US and I would agree with you that they are looking elsewhere to exploit more lucrative emerging markets. Very interesting what you say about China–obviously their next target–tell us more by explaining “everything … transported to China” and Ghost Cities.
It is easier to control an economically wounded America.Reply
KickEm says:April 1, 2011 at 5:23 am
I always thought that the wikileaks thing was too convenient. He has all this “sensitive” information and threatens to use it, but he isn’t dead?
A quote I find relevent (yes, I just like Bill Hicks)… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2NkReply
jocuri says:March 30, 2011 at 6:44 am
Hello there, The net internet site stirring delight learn. IReply
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links : truthexposed.net says:April 1, 2011 at 4:29 am
[…] by blackmang [link] [9 comments] […]Reply
KickEm says:April 1, 2011 at 5:32 am
Almost forgot.. also relevant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloUReply
Revolutionary Politics » Blog Archive » Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links says:April 1, 2011 at 11:14 am
[…] Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links April 1, 2011 – 11:14 am Source: Puppetworld […]Reply
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank and much more… – Stormfront says:April 2, 2011 at 8:43 am
Arty Chauque says:April 3, 2011 at 10:28 pm
It would be nice to know which puppet masters control the strings of che20/20.Reply
che20/20 says:April 3, 2011 at 11:10 pm
the group of activists called Anonymous have highlighted the virtues of anonymity for me. mine is a moot non-identity anyways, because my physical life is mundane and nondescript and has been too uneventful– i’m not imfluential enough to draw the attention of puppetmasters (they offer you good salaries usually). the articles you see on Puppetworld Post is the leaking of a bit of the world inside my head–a passion for truth and justice. that’s all.Reply
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links « Johnsono ne’Blog’as says:April 11, 2011 at 8:54 pm
[…] Wikileaks’ many other links to […]Reply
Arlen Williams says:April 18, 2011 at 9:31 am
What you’re saying is that Anonymous is against central banking, but joins their enemy, central banking operations (WikiLeaks) to… what? fight themselves?
Let’s have some clear thinking, please.
We are Gulag BoundReply
che20/20 says:April 18, 2011 at 10:31 am
Like most people, Anonymous participants are unaware of the substantial evidence linking Wikileaks to the Rothschilds–they dismiss the evidence as conspiracy theory. They are idealistic and want to believe in the new powers of the Internet (i.e. Wikileaks). IMHO, their support of Wikileaks and the latest Colour Revolutions is misguided and should be re-evaluated.
A few bloggers have claimed Anonymous is a CIA OP, but the evidence for this claim is extremely circumstantial and if Anons were a CIA OP it is very unlikely they would produce the strongly worded videos threatening the “New World Order”. It seems most likely they are what they say they are–and that Anons are not aware of the strong ties between Assange and the Rothschilds’ NWO.Reply
Arlen Williams says:April 19, 2011 at 4:16 pm
Thanks. Anarchists, like Islamofascists, have historically been manipulated by Marxist revolutionaries (which in turn are herded by the banksters). Especially considering Anon was begun with a prototype campaign against Scientology of all obscure things, I think it is very likely that it is run by a core with the designs of the above, hardly anonymous to themselves.Reply
Arlen Williams says:April 19, 2011 at 4:17 pm
“Is George Soros a Communist Agent?”
anom says:May 4, 2011 at 1:50 pm
the fact that you dont want any anti zionist crap on here tells us
somthing is not right maybe it’s you that we need to be watching?Reply
che20/20 says:May 4, 2011 at 2:43 pm
Thanks for your input and giving me an opportunity to flesh out my own ideas. I think it is irrational to make any comments that generalize about a whole race, sex, or religion. Many plutocrats (rule by the rich) are not Jewish. Probably the majority of plutocrats wielding power behind the scenes are not Jewish. It’s okay to be against imperialism–American imperialism for example, but it would be a great leap to assume that because the majority of Americans are Christians that US imperialism is Christian imperialism (though many Muslims may not agree). Most people think that US imperialism is about money and not about propogating the Christian Church (so without evidence, you would be accused of bigotry and dismissed as a credible point of view) . So it would be okay to be against Israeli imperialism, but it is a great leap to say it is a plot by the Jews to take over the world. And I repeat: Many plutocrats are not Jewish. Probably the majority of plutocrats wielding power behind the scenes are not Jewish.Reply
David McCann says:May 7, 2011 at 10:11 am
“Hold up here, though an interesting article, its’ seem to me you’re using Assange as a way of exposing and attacking the Masonic/Illuminati members such the Rothschilds, Soro’s, Lieberman, Goldschmidts, Schiffs etc. alongside their ‘yellow journalistic tools’, such as The Guardian, The New York Times and The Economist etc., – whilst discrediting Julian Assange and trying to further damage his reputation in the process.
At the end of the day “Assange” is no different from you or me, as is Bradley Manning. All these two individuals have done, knowing full well their lives are at stake, is follow their own inner beliefs and instincts, as like what I’ve done, – it was my burning desire to help expose ‘the truth’ that made me write Trapped in Masonic World, as I believe what I say with such conviction, I really don’t care about the death threats I too have presently received, – and of course this is what also drives the likes of Assange and Manning on. As Voltaire once said; “Everyman is guilty of all the good he didn’t do”.
So all I’m saying is, it really doesn’t matter if those Illuminati cockroaches, such as your Rothschilds, Soro’s, Goldschmidts or Schiffs are behind and indirectly helping Assange expose ‘the truth’, if it’s ‘the truth’ that’s being exposed.
The successive US government’s and Military denied the existence of the exposed Iraq ‘Collateral Murder’ video until they went blue in the face. And it was the revelation of this video, that alone has caused more international damage to the USA’s reputation than any other of the “leaked” documents combined, and this is the ‘real and sole’ reason they are baiting for Assange’s and Manning’s blood.
As I say, – “the world” already knows many of the above all ready quoted elite families, – are lower than their cockroach belly’s, and whom as a collective help form part of the Illuminati cabals I too exposed and scathingly attack and write about, – but my question is to the author of this said article; “Che20/20”, – as for whose really benefits from writing such a scornful attack against Julian Assange, – other than the Swedish and American authorities themselves? So Che20/20; what’s your ‘real’ CIA name and number?”